OZOptimal ZeroHelp you find the best zero from a statistics view.

Optimal Zero Distance Selection under Stochastic Engagement Range

This page keeps the model simple: define the engagement distance as a random variable, define bullet offset as a function of distance and zero, then optimize the zero against a chosen error metric.

1. Background

When a rifle is zeroed at distance zz, the bullet's line of flight intersects the line of sight at that range. At any other target distance dd, the impact offset is a deterministic function f(d;z)f(d; z) measured in inches relative to the point of aim.

The practical issue is that engagement distance is not known in advance. We therefore model distance as a random variable DD, and treat zero distance as a decision variable chosen under uncertainty.

2. Notation

SymbolDefinition
zzZero distance in yards
DDRandom engagement distance
f(d;z)f(d; z)Ballistic offset at target distance dd
p(d)p(d)Truncated and renormalized range density
μ,σ\mu, \sigmaMean and standard deviation of the engagement model

3. Engagement Model

The engagement distance follows a Gamma distribution:

DGamma(α,β),α=μ2σ2,β=σ2μD \sim \text{Gamma}(\alpha,\beta), \qquad \alpha = \frac{\mu^2}{\sigma^2}, \quad \beta = \frac{\sigma^2}{\mu}

Gamma works here because support is positive, the shape can be right-skewed, and the first two moments map directly to operational assumptions.

4. Ballistic Response

For each candidate zero distance, the model computes a trajectory table and linearly interpolates offset at half-yard resolution.

f(d;z)=interp(trajectory(z),d)f(d;z) = \text{interp}\left(\text{trajectory}(z), d\right)

That offset function is then weighted by the engagement density.

5. Objectives

Weighted Mean Offset

ED[f(D;z)]=0150f(d;z)p(d)dd\mathbb{E}_D[f(D;z)] = \int_0^{150} f(d;z) p(d)\,dd

This shows signed bias, but positive and negative misses can cancel each other out.

Weighted Variance

VarD[f(D;z)]=0150(f(d;z)ED[f(D;z)])2p(d)dd\mathrm{Var}_D[f(D;z)] = \int_0^{150} \left(f(d;z)-\mathbb{E}_D[f(D;z)]\right)^2 p(d)\,dd

This measures consistency across likely engagement ranges.

Weighted Mean Absolute Offset

ED[f(D;z)]=0150f(d;z)p(d)dd\mathbb{E}_D[|f(D;z)|] = \int_0^{150} |f(d;z)|\,p(d)\,dd

This is usually the most operational metric when no hold correction is applied, because misses do not cancel by sign.

6. Optimization

zvar=argminz{1,,100}VarD[f(D;z)]z^*_{\mathrm{var}} = \arg\min_{z \in \{1,\dots,100\}} \mathrm{Var}_D[f(D;z)]
zabs=argminz{1,,100}ED[f(D;z)]z^*_{\mathrm{abs}} = \arg\min_{z \in \{1,\dots,100\}} \mathbb{E}_D[|f(D;z)|]

These criteria emphasize different behavior: consistency versus average miss distance.

7. Numerical Method

The app evaluates a dense grid on [0,150][0,150], interpolates offset values between whole-yard samples, normalizes the Gamma weights, and scores every zero from 1 to 100 yards.

The dashboard exposes riser height, Gamma mean, and Gamma standard deviation as the primary inputs. The recommendation and charts update from those parameters in real time.

8. Baseline Result

Baseline parameters: μ=15\mu = 15 yd, standard deviation =10= 10 yd, riser =2.26= 2.26 in.

CriterionOptimal ZeroVariance (in²)Std Dev (in)Mean Offset (in)Mean |Offset| (in)
Min Variance100 yd0.1080.328-1.7111.711
Min Mean |Offset|19 yd1.3211.149-0.4841.041